PSU Volume 66 No 02 FEBRUARY 2026
Pyloric Atresia and Epidermolysis Bullosa
Pyloric atresia associated with epidermolysis bullosa represents
one of the most severe congenital syndromes encountered in neonatal
medicine, combining a mechanical obstruction of the gastric outlet with
a profound disorder of skin and mucosal integrity. Although pyloric
atresia alone accounts for only a small fraction of intestinal atresia,
its association with epidermolysis bullosa markedly alters the clinical
course, prognosis, and management priorities. This combined condition
is rare, typically presenting in the neonatal period, and is
characterized by early gastrointestinal obstruction, extensive skin
fragility, and a high risk of multisystem complications that frequently
culminate in early mortality .
Clinically, affected neonates usually present within the first days of
life with non-bilious vomiting, feeding intolerance, and progressive
abdominal distension caused by complete obstruction at the level of the
pylorus. Radiographic imaging classically demonstrates a markedly
distended stomach with absence of distal bowel gas, often referred to
as a "single bubble" sign. These findings are often preceded by
antenatal clues, particularly polyhydramnios and fetal gastric dilation
detected on prenatal ultrasonography, reflecting impaired gastric
emptying in utero. At the same time, cutaneous manifestations may be
evident at birth or emerge shortly thereafter, including tense bullae,
erosions, or areas of congenital skin absence. Even minimal mechanical
trauma, such as handling or adhesive application, can provoke new
blister formation, underscoring the extreme fragility of the integument
in this disorder .
Epidermolysis bullosa with pyloric atresia is now recognized as a
genetically determined condition most commonly inherited in an
autosomal recessive pattern. The underlying defect involves proteins
essential for dermo epidermal adhesion, particularly those associated
with hemidesmosomes and the basement membrane zone. Pathogenic variants
in genes encoding integrin a6, integrin ß4, and plectin disrupt
epithelial stability not only in the skin but also in the
gastrointestinal tract, urinary system, and respiratory mucosa. This
explains why the disease extends beyond the skin to involve pyloric
development, renal structures, and internal epithelial linings. The
phenotype varies in severity depending on the nature of the mutation,
but many affected infants experience extensive disease with rapid
clinical deterioration .
From a pathological standpoint, pyloric atresia in this syndrome may
take several anatomical forms, ranging from a thin membranous web to a
solid fibrous cord or a complete gap between the stomach and duodenum.
These anatomical variations have important implications for surgical
management. Less extensive lesions may permit pyloroplasty or excision
of a pyloric membrane, whereas more complex forms require bypass
procedures such as gastroduodenostomy or gastrojejunal anastomosis. In
practice, the choice of operation is often influenced not only by
anatomy but also by the infant's overall condition, body size, tissue
fragility, and the feasibility of safely mobilizing surrounding
structures .
Surgical correction of the pyloric obstruction is essential for
survival, yet it does not alter the underlying disease process. Even
when surgery is technically successful and early postoperative feeding
is achieved, the long-term outcome remains guarded. The postoperative
period is frequently complicated by wound breakdown, infection,
electrolyte disturbances, and feeding difficulties. Skin trauma during
anesthesia, intubation, vascular access, and surgical positioning can
lead to widespread blistering and erosions. As a result, meticulous
perioperative planning is required, including avoidance of adhesive
tapes, careful fixation of tubes, padding of pressure points, and
gentle tissue handling. Central venous access is often necessary for
nutritional and fluid management, but catheter placement itself carries
significant risks in the context of fragile skin and impaired wound
healing .
Beyond the gastrointestinal tract and skin, multisystem involvement is
common and contributes substantially to morbidity and mortality. Renal
and urinary tract anomalies, such as hydronephrosis, dysplastic
kidneys, and obstructive uropathy, have been reported with notable
frequency. Protein-losing enteropathy may develop due to mucosal
fragility within the intestine, leading to chronic diarrhea,
hypoalbuminemia, and failure to thrive. Respiratory complications are
also prominent, including mucosal blistering of the airway, recurrent
aspiration, and severe infections. These complications often interact,
producing a cascade of clinical deterioration that is difficult to
reverse despite intensive supportive care .
Infectious complications remain a leading cause of death in affected
infants. Open skin lesions provide a portal of entry for bacteria,
while immune compromise related to malnutrition and chronic
inflammation further increases susceptibility. Sepsis may develop
rapidly and prove refractory to broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy.
Recurrent pneumonia, whether infectious or aspiration-related, is
another frequent terminal event. Even in cases where initial surgical
and dermatologic management appears successful, late-onset infections
can abruptly worsen the clinical course and lead to fatal outcomes
weeks or months after birth .
Diagnostic confirmation relies on a combination of clinical features,
imaging, and laboratory evaluation. While the diagnosis of pyloric
atresia is usually established radiographically, confirmation of
epidermolysis bullosa may involve skin biopsy with ultrastructural or
immunofluorescence analysis, as well as molecular genetic testing. In
practice, definitive genetic results are often obtained after clinical
decisions have already been made, particularly in rapidly progressive
cases. Nevertheless, establishing the genetic basis is important for
prognostication, family counseling, and future reproductive planning.
Prenatal diagnosis may be possible in families with known mutations,
allowing informed decision-making and anticipatory perinatal care .
The overall prognosis of epidermolysis bullosa with pyloric atresia
remains poor despite advances in neonatal intensive care and surgical
techniques. Mortality is highest in the neonatal period, especially
among infants with extensive skin involvement, severe mutations, and
associated systemic anomalies. A minority of patients survive beyond
infancy, and those who do often face chronic medical challenges,
including persistent skin disease, nutritional deficiencies, and
recurrent infections. Importantly, survival does not necessarily
correlate with the success of pyloric surgery alone, emphasizing that
the gastrointestinal obstruction is only one component of a broader
systemic disorder .
Management therefore requires a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach
that balances aggressive supportive care with realistic assessment of
prognosis. Surgical correction of pyloric atresia should be accompanied
by meticulous dermatologic care, nutritional support, infection
surveillance, and careful handling at every stage of treatment. In some
cases, early involvement of palliative care services may be appropriate
to support families and guide decision-making, particularly when the
burden of disease is overwhelming and the likelihood of long-term
survival is low. Transparent communication with caregivers about the
nature of the condition, expected complications, and potential outcomes
is essential throughout the clinical course .
In summary, pyloric atresia associated with epidermolysis bullosa is a
devastating congenital syndrome rooted in fundamental defects of
epithelial integrity. Its presentation is marked by early gastric
outlet obstruction and severe skin fragility, with frequent involvement
of multiple organ systems. Although surgical intervention is necessary
to relieve pyloric obstruction, it does not address the underlying
genetic disease, and survival remains limited by infectious,
nutritional, and respiratory complications. Continued recognition of
this condition, careful multidisciplinary management, and advances in
genetic diagnosis are essential to improving care and supporting
affected families, even as the prognosis remains guarded in most cases .
References:
1- Lucky AW, Gorell E. Epidermolysis bullosa with pyloric atresia. In:
GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington,
Seattle; 1993–2025. First published February 22, 2008; updated
January 26, 2023.
2- Márquez K, Rodríguez DA, Pérez LA, Duarte M,
Zárate LA. Epidermolysis bullosa with pyloric atresia: Report of
two cases in consecutive siblings. Biomédica.
41(2):201–207, 2021
3- Pan P. Congenital pyloric atresia and epidermolysis bullosa: Report
of a rare association. Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric
Surgeons. 26(4):256–258, 2021
4-Luo C, Yang L, Huang Z, Su Y, Lu Y, Yu D, Zhang M, Wu K. Case report:
Epidermolysis bullosa complicated with pyloric atresia and a literature
review. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 11:1098273, 2023
5- Saleem A, Khan AM, Ahmed M. Pyloric atresia associated with
epidermolysis bullosa: A case report. Journal of Ayub Medical College
Abbottabad. 36(4):838–840, 2024
6- Sakamoto N, Masumoto K, Aoyama T, Shirane K, Homma Y. Pyloric
atresia in a neonate with epidermolysis bullosa: A case report.
Clinical Case Reports. 12(12):e9685, 2024
Tailgut Cysts
Tailgut cysts are rare congenital lesions that arise from remnants
of the embryonic hindgut that fail to regress during early development.
During normal embryogenesis, the tailgut appears transiently as the
most distal portion of the primitive gut and typically involutes by the
sixth week of gestation. When this involution is incomplete, epithelial
remnants persist and may later give rise to cystic lesions in the
presacral or retrorectal space. These cysts are also referred to as
retrorectal cystic hamartomas and represent a small but clinically
significant subset of presacral tumors.
The retrorectal space is anatomically complex and relatively
inaccessible, bordered anteriorly by the rectum, posteriorly by the
sacrum and coccyx, superiorly by the peritoneal reflection, inferiorly
by the pelvic floor musculature, and laterally by major vessels,
ureters, and neural structures. Lesions arising in this space may
remain clinically silent for years due to its capacity to accommodate
slow-growing masses. As a result, tailgut cysts are frequently
discovered incidentally during imaging performed for unrelated
gynecologic, gastrointestinal, or spinal complaints.
Epidemiologically, tailgut cysts show a marked predominance in females
and are most often diagnosed in adults between the third and sixth
decades of life, although cases have been reported across all age
groups, including children. The reasons for the female predominance
remain unclear but may relate to increased detection during pelvic
imaging or gynecologic evaluation. Despite their congenital origin,
presentation in childhood is uncommon, and pediatric cases are
particularly prone to misdiagnosis.
Clinical presentation varies widely. Approximately half of affected
individuals are asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. When symptoms
occur, they are typically related to mass effect on adjacent
structures. Patients may report constipation, tenesmus, pelvic or
rectal pain, dysuria, urinary retention, or a sensation of incomplete
evacuation. In women, symptoms may fluctuate with hormonal changes or
be confused with gynecologic conditions such as endometriosis. In some
cases, pain worsens with prolonged sitting or physical activity,
reflecting pressure on sacral nerve roots.
Complications can arise when cysts become infected, rupture, or bleed.
Infected tailgut cysts may present as recurrent perianal abscesses,
fistulas, or chronic inflammatory masses, often leading to delayed
diagnosis and repeated ineffective interventions. One of the most
clinically significant concerns associated with tailgut cysts is their
potential for malignant transformation. Although historically
considered rare, malignant degeneration has been increasingly reported,
with transformation into adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, or
squamous cell carcinoma. This oncologic risk underpins the consensus
that complete surgical excision is indicated even in asymptomatic
patients.
Radiologic imaging plays a central role in diagnosis and preoperative
planning. Magnetic resonance imaging is generally considered the
modality of choice due to its superior soft tissue contrast and ability
to delineate the relationship between the cyst and surrounding pelvic
structures. Tailgut cysts typically appear as well-defined,
multiloculated cystic lesions with variable signal intensity depending
on their content. High signal intensity on T1-weighted images may
reflect mucinous or protein-rich material, while T2-weighted images
often demonstrate a hyperintense, multicystic pattern. MRI is
particularly valuable in assessing extension above or below the levator
ani muscle, involvement of the sacrum or coccyx, and features
suggestive of malignancy, such as irregular walls, solid components, or
enhancement after contrast administration.
Computed tomography can also be useful, especially when MRI is
unavailable, but it is less specific in characterizing cyst contents
and soft tissue planes. Ultrasonography may detect cystic masses but is
limited in deep pelvic evaluation. Preoperative biopsy is generally
discouraged due to the risk of infection, tumor seeding, and limited
diagnostic yield, as definitive diagnosis relies on histopathological
examination of the resected specimen.
Histologically, tailgut cysts are characterized by a heterogeneous
epithelial lining that may include stratified squamous, columnar,
transitional, or ciliated epithelium, sometimes within the same lesion.
The cyst wall may contain fibrous tissue and smooth muscle but lacks
the organized muscular layers and neural plexuses seen in true
duplication cysts. This histologic diversity reflects the embryologic
origin of the lesion and helps distinguish tailgut cysts from other
presacral entities such as dermoid cysts, epidermoid cysts, teratomas,
anterior meningoceles, and rectal duplications.
The definitive treatment of tailgut cysts is complete surgical excision
with clear margins. The choice of surgical approach depends primarily
on the size and location of the lesion, its relationship to the pelvic
floor, and suspected involvement of adjacent structures. Lesions
located above the level of the levator ani or sacral vertebrae are
commonly approached from an anterior, transabdominal route, while those
located lower in the presacral or retroanal space may be more
accessible via posterior approaches such as the transsacral or
parasacrococcygeal route. In selected cases, a combined anterior and
posterior approach is required, particularly for large lesions,
extensive adhesions, or suspected bony involvement.
Advances in minimally invasive surgery have significantly influenced
the management of tailgut cysts. Laparoscopic and robotic techniques
allow enhanced visualization, precise dissection in confined pelvic
spaces, and improved preservation of nerves and vascular structures.
Robotic-assisted surgery, in particular, offers technical advantages
such as three-dimensional visualization, articulated instruments,
tremor filtration, and improved ergonomics, which are especially
valuable in the narrow presacral space. These techniques have been
associated with reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and faster
recovery compared to traditional open surgery, albeit with longer
operative times in some cases.
Despite these advantages, surgical resection of tailgut cysts remains
technically demanding. Dense adhesions to the rectum, pelvic floor
muscles, or sacrum may be encountered, especially in cases with prior
infection or inflammation. Intraoperative cyst rupture can occur and
should be managed with immediate evacuation and irrigation to minimize
contamination. Injury to the rectal wall, although uncommon, is a
recognized risk and requires prompt repair. In selected cases, partial
or complete coccygectomy may be necessary to achieve complete excision
and reduce recurrence risk.
Postoperative outcomes are generally favorable when complete resection
is achieved. Recurrence is rare but may occur following incomplete
excision or cyst rupture. Long-term follow-up with clinical evaluation
and periodic imaging is advisable, particularly in cases with atypical
histologic features or difficult dissections. When malignant
transformation is identified, management must be individualized and may
involve additional surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy depending on
tumor type and stage.
One of the ongoing challenges in the management of tailgut cysts is
diagnostic delay. Nonspecific symptoms, rarity of the condition, and
overlap with more common pelvic pathologies contribute to misdiagnosis
and prolonged patient morbidity. Increased awareness among surgeons,
radiologists, and clinicians is essential to ensure timely
identification and appropriate referral. A high index of suspicion
should be maintained when evaluating cystic lesions in the presacral
space, particularly in middle-aged women with unexplained pelvic or
rectal symptoms.
In summary, tailgut cysts are uncommon congenital lesions with variable
clinical presentation and significant potential for complications,
including malignant transformation. Accurate diagnosis relies on
high-quality imaging, while definitive management requires complete
surgical excision tailored to the lesion's anatomy. Advances in
minimally invasive and robotic surgery have expanded the therapeutic
options available and improved perioperative outcomes. Given the
complexity of the presacral space and the rarity of these lesions,
optimal management depends on careful preoperative planning, detailed
knowledge of pelvic anatomy, and meticulous surgical technique.
Continued recognition of tailgut cysts as a distinct clinical entity is
essential to prevent delayed treatment and to ensure favorable
long-term outcomes.
References:
1- Rompen IF, Scheiwiller A, Winiger A, Metzger J, Gass JM:
Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Resection of Tailgut Cysts. JSLS.
25(3):e2021.00035, 2021
2- Solís-Peña A, Ngu LWS, Kraft Carré M, Gomez
Jurado MJ, Vallribera Valls F, Pellino G, Espin-Basany E: Robotic
abdominal resection of tailgut cysts – A technical note with
step-by-step description. Colorectal Disease. 24(6):793–796, 2022
3- Haval S, Dwivedi D, Nichkaode P: Presacral tailgut cyst. Annals of African Medicine. 23(2):237–241, 2024
4- Shukla R, Patel JD, Chandna SB, Parikh U: Tailgut cyst in a child: A
case report and review of literature. African Journal of Paediatric
Surgery. ;21(3):184–187, 2024
5- Wojciechowski J, Skolozdrzy T, Wojtasik P, Romanowski M: Two cases
of symptomatic tailgut cysts. Journal of Clinical Medicine.
13(17):5136, 2024
6- Abatli S, AlHabil Y, Hamad MS, Abulibdeh Y: Mature cystic teratoma
mimicking a tailgut cyst in an adolescent female: A case report.
Journal of Surgical Case Reports. (11):rjae719, 2024
Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries
Blunt cerebrovascular injury represents one of the most elusive and
potentially devastating consequences of pediatric trauma. Although
relatively infrequent when compared with other traumatic injuries, its
clinical importance lies in the disproportionate risk of ischemic
stroke, long-term neurologic impairment, and mortality. The challenge
in pediatric populations is amplified by anatomical, physiological, and
developmental factors that obscure early recognition and complicate
diagnostic decision-making. As a result, blunt cerebrovascular injury
remains both underdiagnosed and inconsistently managed, despite growing
awareness of its clinical relevance.
Blunt cerebrovascular injury refers to nonpenetrating damage to the
carotid or vertebral arteries caused by mechanical forces such as
hyperextension, hyperflexion, rotation, or direct blunt impact. These
forces may produce intimal tears, intramural hematomas, pseudoaneurysm
formation, arterial dissection, or complete vessel occlusion. While
these injuries may initially remain clinically silent, they carry a
significant risk of delayed ischemic stroke, sometimes occurring hours
or days after the inciting trauma. This delayed presentation
contributes to diagnostic uncertainty and underscores the importance of
early identification in at-risk patients.
In children, the incidence of blunt cerebrovascular injury has
historically been reported as low, often below one percent of all blunt
trauma admissions. However, increasing evidence suggests that this
figure may reflect underdiagnosis rather than true rarity. Pediatric
patients are less likely to undergo vascular imaging, in part due to
concerns about radiation exposure and the absence of validated
pediatric screening criteria. As imaging practices evolve and awareness
increases, reported incidence rates have risen, with some contemporary
cohorts identifying rates approaching or exceeding one percent when
systematic screening is applied.
Several anatomical and biomechanical characteristics unique to children
influence both injury patterns and detection. A proportionally larger
head, weaker cervical musculature, greater ligamentous laxity, and
increased elasticity of vascular structures contribute to distinctive
injury mechanisms. These features may paradoxically offer some
protection against vessel rupture while simultaneously predisposing to
stretching and intimal damage. The result is a spectrum of vascular
injury that may not produce immediate neurologic signs yet carries a
substantial risk for delayed ischemic events.
Motor vehicle collisions remain the most common mechanism associated
with pediatric blunt cerebrovascular injury. Within this context,
restraint use plays a nuanced role. Proper restraint has been shown to
reduce overall injury severity and may lower the risk of vascular
injury in younger children. Conversely, improper restraint or
high-energy mechanisms can transmit rotational and shearing forces to
the cervical vasculature, increasing injury risk. Notably, while
cervical seatbelt signs have historically been viewed as red flags,
their predictive value for vascular injury in children appears
inconsistent, and their absence does not exclude significant pathology.
Beyond mechanism of injury, several anatomical and clinical features
have emerged as important predictors. Cervical spine fractures,
particularly those involving the upper cervical segments, are among the
strongest associated factors. Basilar skull fractures, facial
fractures—especially Le Fort–type patterns—and
intracranial hemorrhage also demonstrate strong associations. Depressed
Glasgow Coma Scale scores and higher overall injury severity scores
further increase suspicion. Conversely, isolated soft tissue injuries
of the neck, once considered highly suggestive, have shown limited
predictive value in pediatric populations.
Despite these associations, no single clinical feature reliably
predicts blunt cerebrovascular injury. This has led to the development
of screening algorithms intended to identify high-risk patients. Many
of these tools were initially developed in adult populations and later
extrapolated to children. Unfortunately, when applied to pediatric
cohorts, these adult-derived criteria demonstrate limited sensitivity.
In some analyses, commonly used screening frameworks identify only a
small fraction of affected children, missing a substantial number of
cases that ultimately develop cerebrovascular complications.
More recent pediatric-focused screening models have attempted to
improve sensitivity by incorporating age-specific injury patterns and
mechanisms. When applied consistently, these approaches have increased
detection rates, but at the cost of increased imaging utilization. This
trade-off highlights the ongoing tension between minimizing radiation
exposure and preventing devastating neurologic outcomes. Importantly,
studies implementing structured screening protocols have demonstrated
higher detection rates than historical controls, suggesting that
underdiagnosis remains a central concern.
Imaging modality selection remains another critical consideration.
Computed tomographic angiography has become the primary diagnostic tool
due to its availability and rapid acquisition. However, its sensitivity
in detecting subtle intimal injuries is imperfect, particularly in
children. While specificity is generally high, false-negative results
still occur. Digital subtraction angiography remains the gold standard
but is invasive and rarely used as a first-line modality in pediatric
trauma. Magnetic resonance angiography offers a radiation-free
alternative, although its availability and feasibility in acute
settings are limited. Consequently, clinical judgment continues to play
a decisive role in determining when imaging is warranted.
Once identified, management strategies for blunt cerebrovascular injury
in children largely mirror those used in adults, despite the lack of
pediatric-specific outcome data. Antithrombotic therapy—either
antiplatelet agents or anticoagulation—constitutes the
cornerstone of treatment for most low- to moderate-grade injuries.
Surgical or endovascular interventions are reserved for select cases
involving high-grade lesions, progressive neurologic deficits, or
failure of medical therapy. Observation alone may be appropriate in
select low-risk cases, particularly when bleeding risk or concomitant
injuries limit pharmacologic intervention.
Outcomes in pediatric patients appear comparable to those observed in
adults when injuries are identified and treated promptly. Stroke
remains the most feared complication and may occur even after diagnosis
and initiation of therapy, although its incidence decreases
significantly with early recognition. Reported stroke rates vary across
studies, reflecting differences in screening intensity, diagnostic
thresholds, and follow-up practices. Importantly, pediatric patients
often demonstrate favorable neurological recovery compared with adults,
potentially reflecting greater neuroplasticity.
Despite these advances, management remains inconsistent across
institutions. Treatment strategies vary widely with respect to
medication choice, duration of therapy, and follow-up imaging. Some
children discontinue antithrombotic therapy prematurely, while others
remain on prolonged treatment without clear evidence-based guidance.
These inconsistencies underscore the need for standardized
pediatric-specific protocols informed by prospective, multicenter data.
Comparative analyses between pediatric and adult populations reveal
both similarities and distinctions. Injury mechanisms and vascular
territories involved are broadly comparable, yet children tend to
present with higher injury severity scores and more frequent carotid
involvement, whereas vertebral artery injuries appear more common in
adults. Despite these differences, overall outcomes—including
stroke rates and mortality—are largely similar when comparable
management strategies are applied. This suggests that adult-derived
treatment frameworks may be pragmatically applied to children, though
they are not ideal substitutes for pediatric-specific guidelines.
In summary, blunt cerebrovascular injury in children represents a
complex and often underrecognized consequence of blunt trauma. Its
detection is hindered by subtle clinical presentation, variable risk
factors, and limitations of existing screening tools. Recognition of
high-risk mechanisms and injury patterns, combined with judicious use
of imaging and timely therapeutic intervention, can significantly
mitigate the risk of catastrophic neurologic outcomes. Continued
research and collaborative efforts are essential to refine screening
strategies, optimize management, and ultimately improve outcomes for
this vulnerable population.
References:
1- Farzaneh CA, Schomberg J, Sullivan BG, Guner YS, Nance ML, Gibbs D,
Yu PT: Development and validation of machine learning models for the
prediction of blunt cerebrovascular injury in children. Journal of
Pediatric Surgery. 57(4):732–738, 2022
2- El Tawil C, Nemeth J, Al Sawafi M: Pediatric blunt cerebrovascular
injuries: Approach and management. Pediatric Emergency Care.
40(4):319–322, 2024
3- Nickoles TA, Lewit RA, Notrica DM, Ryan M, Johnson J, Maxson RT,
Naiditch JA, Lawson KA, Temkit M, Padilla B, Eubanks JW III: Lower
incidence of blunt cerebrovascular injury among young, properly
restrained children: An ATOMAC multicenter study. Journal of Trauma and
Acute Care Surgery. 95(3):334–340, 2023
4- Schulz M, Weihing V, Shah MN, Cox CS Jr, Ugalde I: Risk factors for
blunt cerebrovascular injury in the pediatric patient: A systematic
review.
American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 71:37–46, 2023
5- Lewit RA, Nickoles TA, Williams R, Notrica DM, Stottlemyre RL, Ryan
M, Johnson JJ, Naiditch JA, Lawson KA, Maxson RT, Grimes S, Eubanks JW
III: Blunt cerebrovascular injury in children: A prospective
multicenter ATOMAC+ study. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery.
99(2):245–252, 2025
6- Asaadi S, Rosenthal MG, Radulescu A, Mukherjee K, Luo-Owen X, Dubose
JJ, Tabrizi MB; AAST PROOVIT Study Group: Pediatric versus adult
blunt cerebrovascular injuries: Patient characteristics, management,
and outcomes. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 116:1–8, 2025
PSU Volume 66 No 03 MARCH 2026
Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome
Cannabis has long occupied an unusual position in medicine and
culture. For centuries it has been associated with relief—of
pain, anxiety, nausea, and loss of appetite. In modern clinical
practice, cannabinoids are frequently invoked as antiemetics,
particularly in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Yet over the
past two decades, an unsettling paradox has emerged: in a subset of
chronic users, cannabis appears to provoke the very symptoms it is
known to suppress. Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome (CHS) is the name
given to this contradiction, and its increasing prevalence reflects
both changing patterns of cannabis use and the evolving potency of the
substance itself.
CHS is characterized by recurrent episodes of severe nausea, vomiting,
and abdominal pain in the setting of chronic cannabis exposure.
Patients are often young, otherwise healthy, and deeply familiar with
emergency departments long before a diagnosis is made. What
distinguishes CHS from other causes of cyclic vomiting is not a
laboratory test or imaging finding, but a constellation of behaviors,
histories, and responses that only become coherent when cannabis use is
examined honestly and longitudinally.
The syndrome often unfolds in phases. In the prodromal period, patients
experience early-morning nausea, vague epigastric discomfort, and a
growing fear of vomiting. Appetite may decline, but cannabis use
frequently increases, driven by the belief that it will alleviate
symptoms. This phase can persist for months or years, often unnoticed
or misattributed to anxiety, gastritis, or functional gastrointestinal
disorders. Over time, however, the illness progresses into a
hyperemetic phase marked by relentless vomiting, abdominal pain,
dehydration, electrolyte disturbances, and repeated hospital visits.
Vomiting may occur dozens of times per day, leading to acute kidney
injury, metabolic derangements, and profound physical exhaustion.
One of the most striking features of CHS is the compulsive use of hot
showers or baths for symptomatic relief. Patients often describe
standing under scalding water for prolonged periods, sometimes multiple
times a day, as the only intervention that provides even transient
comfort. This behavior is so characteristic that its presence strongly
supports the diagnosis, yet it is frequently overlooked or dismissed as
incidental. The relief appears to be mediated through cutaneous heat
activation rather than psychological comfort, suggesting a
neurophysiologic mechanism rather than a learned coping strategy.
The pathophysiology of CHS remains incompletely understood, but several
converging mechanisms have been proposed. Chronic exposure to
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) appears to alter cannabinoid
receptor signaling, particularly at the CB1 receptor, which plays a
central role in gastrointestinal motility, visceral sensation, and
emesis control. With sustained stimulation, these receptors may become
dysregulated or desensitized, leading to a paradoxical proemetic
effect. THC also interacts with dopamine and serotonin pathways, both
of which are intimately involved in nausea and vomiting. Over time,
these interactions may shift from inhibitory to excitatory, especially
in susceptible individuals.
Another important pathway involves the transient receptor potential
vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) receptor, commonly known as the capsaicin receptor.
TRPV1 is activated by heat and capsaicin and plays a role in pain
perception and autonomic regulation. Chronic cannabis use appears to
overstimulate TRPV1 receptors centrally while impairing their
peripheral modulation, leading to splanchnic vasodilation, nausea, and
abdominal pain. External heat or topical capsaicin may temporarily
restore balance by activating peripheral TRPV1 receptors, explaining
both the compulsive hot bathing behavior and the emerging role of
capsaicin cream as a therapeutic adjunct.
Clinically, CHS presents a diagnostic challenge because it closely
resembles cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS), a disorder of gut–brain
interaction that predates the recognition of CHS by more than a
century. Both conditions feature episodic vomiting with symptom-free
intervals, abdominal pain, and significant morbidity. The key
distinction lies in the temporal relationship between cannabis use and
symptom onset, as well as the resolution of symptoms with sustained
abstinence. Unfortunately, this distinction is often blurred because
patients with CVS may use cannabis to self-medicate, and patients with
CHS frequently deny or underreport use, either due to stigma or genuine
disbelief that cannabis could be the cause.
Laboratory and imaging studies in CHS are typically nonspecific.
Mild leukocytosis, hypokalemia, metabolic alkalosis, and elevated
creatinine from dehydration are common but not diagnostic. Imaging
studies are often normal and rarely change management, yet they are
frequently repeated as clinicians search for structural explanations.
The absence of definitive tests contributes to diagnostic delay and
unnecessary healthcare utilization, reinforcing patient frustration and
clinician uncertainty.
Acute management of CHS focuses on supportive care. Intravenous
fluids are essential to correct dehydration and electrolyte
abnormalities. Traditional antiemetics such as ondansetron or
promethazine may provide partial relief but are often ineffective.
Dopamine antagonists, particularly those that act centrally, have
demonstrated greater efficacy in controlling symptoms, though they
require careful monitoring due to potential cardiac and extrapyramidal
side effects. Benzodiazepines may be helpful in select cases,
especially when anxiety exacerbates symptoms, but they do not address
the underlying mechanism. Topical capsaicin applied to the abdomen has
emerged as a low-cost, low-risk intervention that can reduce nausea and
vomiting by exploiting TRPV1-mediated pathways.
Despite these measures, the only definitive treatment for CHS is
complete cessation of cannabis use. Symptom resolution typically occurs
within days to weeks of abstinence, though residual nausea may persist
as THC is slowly released from adipose tissue. Relapse is common if
cannabis use resumes, often with a shorter latency and more severe
symptoms. This pattern underscores the importance of recognizing CHS
not only as a gastrointestinal disorder but also as a condition
intertwined with substance use behavior, mental health, and social
context.
The chronic phase of management therefore extends beyond the emergency
department or hospital ward. Patients require education that reframes
cannabis not as a remedy but as a trigger. This conversation is often
difficult, particularly in an era when cannabis is widely perceived as
benign or therapeutic. Many patients express disbelief, anger, or grief
when confronted with the diagnosis, especially if cannabis has played a
central role in their identity, coping strategies, or social
environment. Addressing comorbid anxiety, depression, and substance use
disorder is critical to sustained recovery, as these conditions
frequently drive continued use despite clear consequences.
CHS is not a benign syndrome. Repeated episodes of severe vomiting can
lead to esophageal injury, aspiration, acute renal failure, and
life-threatening electrolyte disturbances. Prolonged QT intervals,
particularly in the context of antiemetic use, increase the risk of
malignant arrhythmias. The economic burden is substantial, driven by
repeated emergency visits, hospitalizations, diagnostic testing, and
lost productivity. Yet despite its growing prevalence, CHS remains
underrecognized, underdiagnosed, and often misunderstood.
The increasing legalization and commercialization of cannabis have
altered both the frequency and intensity of exposure. Modern cannabis
products often contain significantly higher concentrations of THC than
those used in prior decades, and new delivery systems allow for rapid,
repeated dosing. These changes may partially explain why CHS is being
identified more frequently and at younger ages. At the same time,
cultural narratives surrounding cannabis as a natural or harmless
substance may delay recognition of its adverse effects, both by
patients and clinicians.
Understanding CHS requires abandoning simple binaries of "good" or
"bad" drugs and embracing a more nuanced view of dose, duration,
individual susceptibility, and neurobiology. Cannabis can be both
antiemetic and emetogenic, therapeutic and toxic, depending on context.
CHS occupies the uncomfortable space where these contradictions
converge, reminding clinicians that physiology does not always conform
to expectation or intention.
As awareness grows, earlier recognition of CHS offers the possibility
of reducing harm, avoiding unnecessary testing, and guiding patients
toward effective treatment. Doing so requires careful listening,
nonjudgmental inquiry into substance use, and a willingness to question
assumptions—both the patient's and the clinician's. In this
sense, CHS is not only a medical syndrome but also a lesson in clinical
humility: a reminder that even familiar remedies can betray us when
used without limits, and that relief, like illness, often carries a
history we must learn to read.
References:
1- Lonsdale H, Wilsey MJ: Paediatric cannabinoid hyperemesis. Current Opinion in Pediatrics. 34(5):510–515, 2022
2- Geraci E, Cake C, Mulieri KM, Fenn NE 3rd: Comparison of antiemetics
in the management of pediatric cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome.
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
28(3):222–227, 2023
3- Shah M, Jergel A, George RP, Jenkins E, Bashaw H: Distinguishing
clinical features of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome and cyclic
vomiting syndrome: A retrospective cohort study. The Journal of
Pediatrics. 271:114054, 2024
4- Ibia IE, Toce MS: Cannabis hyperemesis syndrome in children: A
review of epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, and treatment. Pediatric
Emergency Care. 41(5):397–405, 2025
5- Meyer J, Burns MM: Current recommendations in the diagnosis and
management of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome. Current Opinion in
Pediatrics. 37(3):240–243, 2025
6- Yacob D: Cyclic vomiting syndrome and cannabinoid hyperemesis
syndrome: Their intersection and joint existence. Gastroenterology
Clinics of North America. 54(3):557–568, 2025
Non-Operative Management of Appendicitis
Acute appendicitis remains one of the most common surgical
emergencies worldwide, traditionally managed by appendectomy as
definitive therapy. For more than a century, early surgical removal of
the appendix was justified by the belief that appendicitis represents a
progressive disease that inevitably leads to perforation if left
untreated. However, advances in diagnostic imaging, antimicrobial
therapy, and a growing body of clinical evidence have challenged this
paradigm, giving rise to renewed interest in non-operative management
using antibiotics alone, particularly in cases of uncomplicated
appendicitis.
The conceptual shift underlying non-operative management is rooted in
the recognition that appendicitis may not represent a single disease
process. Instead, it appears to encompass a spectrum ranging from mild,
self-limited inflammation to severe gangrenous or perforated disease.
This distinction has profound implications for treatment strategies.
Uncomplicated appendicitis, characterized by localized inflammation
without perforation, abscess, or phlegmon, has emerged as a potential
target for conservative treatment. The increasing use of
high-resolution ultrasound and computed tomography has improved
diagnostic accuracy, enabling clinicians to more reliably identify
patients who may be suitable for non-operative approaches.
Across adult and pediatric populations, antibiotic-first strategies
have demonstrated high rates of initial clinical success. Most patients
experience symptom resolution during the index admission without the
need for urgent surgery. These findings suggest that, in selected
patients, acute appendicitis can be effectively controlled with
antimicrobial therapy, avoiding the immediate risks associated with
anesthesia and surgery. Moreover, the observation that many patients do
not experience disease progression despite delayed or absent surgical
intervention has further weakened the long-held assumption that
appendicitis is uniformly progressive.
Despite these encouraging early outcomes, the long-term durability of
non-operative management remains a central concern. Recurrence of
appendicitis or failure of antibiotic therapy requiring appendectomy is
consistently reported during follow-up, particularly within the first
year. While a substantial proportion of patients avoid surgery
altogether, cumulative failure rates increase over time, resulting in a
significant minority ultimately undergoing appendectomy. This pattern
underscores an important distinction between short-term treatment
success and definitive cure. From a clinical perspective, non-operative
management may be best understood not as a replacement for surgery, but
as an alternative initial strategy that defers or potentially avoids
operative intervention.
Complication profiles associated with non-operative and operative
management differ in nature rather than magnitude. Appendectomy, even
when performed laparoscopically, carries risks related to anesthesia,
surgical site infection, postoperative pain, and, in rare cases, more
serious adverse events. However, contemporary surgical techniques have
markedly reduced morbidity, and appendectomy remains one of the safest
emergency operations performed in both adults and children. In
contrast, non-operative management avoids surgical risks but introduces
others, including antibiotic-related adverse effects, increased rates
of unplanned healthcare visits, and the psychological burden associated
with recurrence risk. Importantly, available evidence suggests that
delayed appendectomy following failed non-operative treatment does not
result in a substantially higher rate of severe complications when
appropriate monitoring and timely intervention are ensured.
Length of hospital stay has been widely examined as a comparative
outcome between treatment strategies. Contrary to the perception that
conservative management necessarily shortens hospitalization,
antibiotic-based treatment often requires prolonged observation and
intravenous therapy, leading to longer initial hospital stays than
early appendectomy. Surgical management, particularly when minimally
invasive, offers predictable postoperative recovery and discharge
timelines. Nevertheless, some patients treated non-operatively may
resume normal activities sooner and require less postoperative
analgesia, highlighting that hospital length of stay alone does not
fully capture functional recovery.
The presence of an appendicolith has emerged as a critical predictor of
non-operative treatment failure. Patients with appendicoliths
consistently demonstrate higher rates of recurrence, complications, and
subsequent appendectomy when managed with antibiotics alone. This
finding supports the hypothesis that luminal obstruction plays a key
role in disease persistence and progression in a subset of patients. As
a result, many contemporary protocols exclude patients with
appendicoliths from non-operative management, emphasizing the
importance of careful patient selection based on imaging findings.
In pediatric populations, the debate surrounding non-operative
management is particularly nuanced. Children generally tolerate
appendectomy well, with low complication rates and excellent long-term
outcomes. At the same time, avoidance of surgery may be appealing to
families seeking to minimize procedural intervention, postoperative
pain, or school absence. Evidence in children demonstrates that
non-operative management is safe in the short term, with no increase in
mortality or severe morbidity. However, non-inferiority to appendectomy
has not been consistently demonstrated when long-term failure rates are
considered. A substantial proportion of children initially treated with
antibiotics ultimately require appendectomy, raising questions about
the overall effectiveness of conservative management in this population.
Quality of life considerations further complicate treatment decisions.
Patients managed non-operatively often report less pain and reduced use
of analgesics in the early phase, as well as faster return to daily
activities. Conversely, the uncertainty associated with recurrence risk
and the need for ongoing vigilance may negatively impact long-term
quality of life for some patients and families. Appendectomy, while
associated with short-term postoperative discomfort, offers definitive
resolution and eliminates the risk of recurrence. These contrasting
experiences highlight the importance of incorporating patient and
family preferences into shared decision-making processes.
From a healthcare system perspective, non-operative management offers
both potential benefits and challenges. Reduced operative volume may
alleviate surgical workload and resource utilization, particularly in
settings with limited operating room availability. However, increased
rates of emergency department visits, readmissions, and delayed surgery
may offset these advantages. Economic analyses remain heterogeneous,
reflecting differences in healthcare delivery models, antibiotic
protocols, and follow-up practices.
Taken together, current evidence supports non-operative management as a
safe and feasible option for carefully selected patients with
uncomplicated appendicitis, particularly in the absence of
appendicoliths and when reliable follow-up can be ensured. Nonetheless,
appendectomy remains the most definitive treatment, with the highest
likelihood of permanent resolution and predictable outcomes. Rather
than framing these strategies as competing approaches, contemporary
practice increasingly recognizes them as complementary options within a
patient-centered framework.
Future research should focus on refining selection criteria,
identifying biomarkers predictive of sustained response to antibiotics,
and standardizing treatment protocols. Long-term outcome data extending
beyond one year are essential to better define true treatment
effectiveness. Additionally, greater emphasis on patient-reported
outcomes will enhance understanding of how different management
strategies impact quality of life.
In conclusion, non-operative management represents a significant
evolution in the treatment of acute appendicitis. While it challenges
long-standing surgical dogma, its role is best defined as an
individualized option rather than a universal substitute for
appendectomy. Ongoing evidence continues to shape a more nuanced,
personalized approach to appendicitis care, balancing efficacy, safety,
patient preference, and healthcare system considerations.
References:
1- Jumah S, Wester T: Non-operative management of acute appendicitis in
children. Pediatric Surgery International. 39(1):11, 2022
2- Zagales I, Sauder M, Selvakumar S, Spardy J, Santos RG, Cruz J,
Bilski T, Elkbuli A: Comparing outcomes of appendectomy versus
non-operative antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis: A systematic
review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. The American
Surgeon. 89(6):2644–2655, 2023
3- Decker E, Ndzi A, Kenny S, Harwood R: Systematic review and
meta-analysis to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of
non-operative management with early operative management of simple
appendicitis in children after the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of
Pediatric Surgery. 59(6):1050–1057, 2024
4- Adams SE, Perera MRS, Fung S, Maxton J, Karpelowsky J: Non-operative
management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children: A randomized,
controlled, non-inferiority study evaluating safety and efficacy. ANZ
Journal of Surgery. 94(9):1569–1577, 2024
5- St Peter SD, Noel-MacDonnell JR, Hall NJ, Eaton S, Suominen JS,
Wester T, Svensson JF, Almström M, Muenks EP, Beaudin M,
Piché N, Brindle M, MacRobie A, Keijzer R, Engstrand Lilja H,
Kassa AM, Jancelewicz T, Butter A, Davidson J, Skarsgard E, Te-Lu Y,
Nah S, Willan AR, Pierro A: Appendicectomy versus antibiotics for acute
uncomplicated appendicitis in children: An open-label, international,
multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet.
405:233–240, 2025
6- Brucchi F, Filisetti C, Luconi E, Fugazzola P, Cattaneo D, Ansaloni
L, Zuccotti G, Ferraro S, Danelli P, Pelizzo G: Non-operative
management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children, why not? A
meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Journal of
Emergency Surgery. 20:25, 2025
Pediatric Crotalid Snakebites
Pediatric crotalid snakebites represent a distinct but
well-characterized subset of venomous injuries in the United States,
accounting for a substantial proportion of snakebite-related morbidity
in children. Crotalid snakes, which include rattlesnakes, copperheads,
and cottonmouths, are responsible for the vast majority of venomous
snake envenomation nationwide. Although children differ physiologically
from adults, accumulated evidence indicates that the clinical course,
systemic toxicity, and outcomes of pediatric crotalid envenomation
closely parallel those observed in adults, with important nuances
related to venom effects, laboratory abnormalities, and patterns of
care .
Envenomation typically results from defensive bites and most often
involves the extremities. Lower extremity bites predominate overall,
particularly in younger children, whereas upper extremity bites are
more common in older children and adolescents, reflecting behavioral
and environmental exposure patterns. Local manifestations are nearly
universal and include pain, edema, erythema, and ecchymosis, which may
progress proximally from the bite site. Tissue necrosis and blistering
occur less frequently and, when present, are often associated with
delayed presentation or more severe envenomation. Importantly, after
adjusting for bite location, the likelihood of necrosis does not differ
substantially between pediatric and adult patients, underscoring that
venom dose and composition rather than patient size are key
determinants of local tissue injury .
Systemic toxicity is a defining concern in crotalid envenomation and is
primarily hematologic in nature. Venom-induced coagulopathy,
hypofibrinogenemia, and thrombocytopenia result from consumption and
degradation of clotting factors mediated by venom metalloproteinases
and other enzymes. Pediatric patients demonstrate early hematologic
abnormalities at rates comparable to or slightly higher than adults,
particularly with respect to hypofibrinogenemia and prolonged
coagulation parameters during the initial phase of care. However, late
or recurrent hematologic toxicity, which may occur after apparent
initial control, develops at similar frequencies in children and adults
and rarely leads to clinically significant bleeding when appropriately
monitored and treated .
Geographic and climatic factors influence the epidemiology and severity
of pediatric snakebites. Children bitten in semi-arid regions are more
likely to encounter rattlesnakes, present earlier to care, and require
higher levels of monitoring and antivenom administration compared with
those in subtropical regions, where copperhead bites are more common.
These regional differences translate into longer hospital stays,
increased intensive care utilization, and higher antivenom dosing in
high-risk environments, despite similar rates of laboratory
abnormalities and overall survival . Notably, mortality from pediatric
crotalid envenomation remains exceedingly rare in modern series.
Antivenom therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for moderate to
severe envenomation and is administered based on clinical progression
rather than patient age or weight. Ovine-derived Crotalidae polyvalent
immune Fab has become the most widely used antivenom and has
demonstrated a favorable safety profile in children. Acute
hypersensitivity reactions, historically a major concern with older
whole IgG antivenoms, are uncommon with Fab-based products. Large
pediatric cohorts have reported no acute hypersensitivity reactions
during or shortly after infusion, even among patients requiring
intensive care and relatively high cumulative doses. Delayed
complications such as recurrent coagulopathy may occur but are not
directly attributable to allergic mechanisms and instead reflect the
pharmacokinetics of venom and antivenom interactions .
Despite its efficacy, antivenom use varies widely, particularly in
copperhead envenomation, which is often milder and may be self-limited.
Younger age, upper extremity bites, progression of local tissue effects
across major joints, and the presence of comorbidities have all been
associated with increased likelihood of antivenom administration. These
practice variations highlight ongoing controversy regarding optimal
thresholds for treatment and emphasize the need for standardized,
evidence-based decision tools to balance benefits, risks, and resource
utilization .
In response to variability in care, pediatric-specific management
strategies have been developed to better align treatment intensity with
clinical severity. The Pediatric Crotalid Envenomation Score integrates
physical examination findings and basic coagulation laboratory values
to stratify patients into severity tiers that guide admission level and
antivenom dosing. Implementation of such structured guidelines has been
associated with significant reductions in intensive care admissions and
ICU length of stay, without increases in hospital length of stay,
readmissions, or adverse outcomes. Importantly, these protocols
preserve excellent clinical results while conserving critical resources
and reducing unnecessary exposure to antivenom in children with mild
envenomation .
Overall outcomes in pediatric crotalid snakebites are favorable when
modern supportive care, timely antivenom administration, and
appropriate monitoring are employed. Surgical intervention is rarely
required and is typically limited to selected cases involving
compartment syndrome or significant tissue compromise. Long-term
functional impairment is uncommon, and most children recover fully with
minimal residual effects. The growing body of pediatric-focused
evidence reinforces that children should not be managed more
aggressively solely because of age or size; rather, they should be
treated according to objective clinical and laboratory indicators of
venom effect.
In summary, pediatric crotalid snakebites produce a spectrum of local
and systemic effects that closely resemble those seen in adults. Early
hematologic abnormalities may be more prominent in children, but
overall severity, late toxicity, and outcomes are similar across age
groups. Antivenom therapy is safe and effective in pediatric patients,
with a very low incidence of hypersensitivity reactions. Regional
differences in snake species and exposure patterns influence resource
utilization, underscoring the importance of context-specific
preparedness. The adoption of pediatric-specific severity scoring
systems and treatment guidelines represents an important advance,
enabling high-quality, efficient care while maintaining excellent
outcomes for children affected by crotalid envenomation.
References:
1- Levine M, Ruha AM, Wolk B, Caravati M, Brent J, Campleman S, Wax P;
ToxIC North American Snakebite Study Group: When It Comes to
Snakebites, Kids Are Little Adults: a Comparison of Adults and Children
with Rattlesnake Bites. J Med Toxicol. 16(4):444–451, 2020
2- Chotai PN, Watlington J, Lewis S, Pyo T, Abdelgawad AA, Huang EY:
Pediatric Snakebites: Comparing Patients in Two Geographic Locations in
the United States. J Surg Res. 265:297–302, 2021
3- Corbett B, Otter J, Masom CP, Clark RF: Prevalence of Acute
Hypersensitivity Reactions in Pediatric Patients Receiving Crotalidae
Polyvalent Immune Fab. J Med Toxicol. 17(1):48–50, 2021
4- Ramirez-Cueva F, Larsen A, Knowlton E, Baab K, Rainey Kiehl R,
Hendrix A, Condren M, Woslager M: Predictors of FabAV use in copperhead
envenomation. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 60(5):609–614, 2022
5-Malek AJ, Criscitiello AA, Nes EK, Regner JL, Zamin SA, Wills HE,
Little DC, Stagg HW: Development of the pediatric Crotalid envenomation
score guideline and its influence on resource utilization. J Pediatr
Surg. 61(1):162549, 2026