PEDIATRIC SURGERY UPDATE ©

VOLUME 63 NO 04 OCTOBER 2024

Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection

Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection (RPLND) is a crucial surgical technique primarily used in the management of testicular cancer and certain pediatric malignancies such as paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma. Over the years, the technique has evolved significantly with advancements in minimally invasive surgery and the advent of robotic assistance, offering improved outcomes and reduced morbidity for patients. This review synthesizes information from multiple studies to provide a comprehensive understanding of the efficacy, safety, and advancements in laparoscopic and robot-assisted RPLND.

The earliest use of laparoscopic RPLND was reported in 1992, marking a significant shift from the traditional open surgical approach. The primary advantage of laparoscopic RPLND over open surgery lies in its minimally invasive nature, which translates to reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and quicker recovery times. A study from 2010 highlighted the successful use of laparoscopic RPLND in high-risk pediatric patients with paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma (PTRMS). The study reported that laparoscopic RPLND is a safe and effective diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for children over ten years of age with primary tumors larger than 5 cm. The average operative time was 382 minutes, with minimal blood loss and no significant postoperative complications, allowing for rapid commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Robot-assisted RPLND (RA-RPLND) emerged as a significant advancement in the early 2000s, offering enhanced precision and visualization through robotic technology. The da Vinci Surgical System, for instance, has been instrumental in performing complex dissections with improved dexterity and control. A 2017 study documented the use of the da Vinci Xi system for RA-RPLND in adolescent patients. The study included two cases: a 17-year-old male with a mixed non-seminomatous germ cell tumor and a 15-year-old male with ectomesenchymoma. Both cases reported successful outcomes with no intraoperative complications and minimal blood loss. The robotic approach allowed for precise nerve-sparing dissections, preserving ejaculatory function in the patients.

Further supporting the efficacy of RA-RPLND, a 2012 study presented two adolescent cases involving paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma (PT-RMS) and testicular germ cell tumor (T-GCT). The study emphasized that RA-RPLND is not only feasible but also provides excellent oncologic outcomes with low morbidity. The enhanced three-dimensional visualization and precise instrumentation afforded by robotic systems contribute to better surgical outcomes, including reduced risk of complications such as vascular and bowel injuries.

Despite the advantages, the learning curve associated with RA-RPLND is steep, requiring significant expertise in both laparoscopic and robotic surgery. A comprehensive review of robotic-assisted surgeries highlighted that proficiency in RA-RPLND could take up to 200 cases. However, the benefits, including reduced operative times and enhanced safety through robotic training modules, justify the initial learning curve. Additionally, the use of proctors and robotic training modules can further mitigate the risks associated with the learning curve, ensuring safer and more efficient surgeries.

Long-term oncologic outcomes of RA-RPLND have been encouraging. Studies have shown that RA-RPLND offers comparable, if not superior, results to traditional open and laparoscopic approaches in terms of disease-free survival rates. For instance, patients undergoing RA-RPLND for clinical stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumors have reported high safety and early oncologic effectiveness, with minimal long-term complications. Moreover, the minimally invasive nature of the procedure reduces the likelihood of postoperative complications such as chylous ascites, ileus, and small bowel obstruction, which are more common in open surgeries.

The role of RA-RPLND in pediatric populations, although limited, has shown promising results. Pediatric patients, due to their smaller anatomical structures, present unique challenges in surgical management. The precision and enhanced visualization provided by robotic systems are particularly beneficial in this demographic, allowing for meticulous dissection and preservation of vital structures. Studies have reported that RA-RPLND in pediatric patients results in shorter hospital stays, quicker recovery times, and lower incidence of complications compared to open surgery.

However, despite its advantages, RA-RPLND is not without its limitations. The high cost of robotic systems and the need for extensive training are significant barriers to widespread adoption. Additionally, the lack of long-term data in pediatric populations necessitates further research to fully understand the long-term outcomes and potential late effects of the procedure. Ongoing studies and patient registries are crucial in addressing these gaps and providing more comprehensive data on the efficacy and safety of RA-RPLND.

In conclusion, laparoscopic and robot-assisted RPLND represent significant advancements in the surgical management of retroperitoneal lymph node dissections. The transition from open surgery to minimally invasive and robotic-assisted techniques has resulted in improved patient outcomes, reduced morbidity, and quicker recovery times. While the learning curve and high costs associated with robotic systems remain challenges, the benefits offered by RA-RPLND, particularly in terms of precision and safety, make it a valuable option in the surgical armamentarium. Continued research and long-term studies will further elucidate the role of RA-RPLND in both adult and pediatric populations, ensuring that patients receive the most effective and least invasive treatment options available.

References:
1- Tomaszewski JJ, Sweeney DD, Kavoussi LR, Ost MC: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for high-risk pediatric patients with paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma. J Endourol. 24(1):31-4, 2010
2- Cost NG, DaJusta DG, Granberg CF, Cooksey RM, Laborde CE, Wickiser JE, Gargollo PC: Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in an adolescent population. J Endourol. 26(6):635-40, 2012
3- Glaser AP, Bowen DK, Lindgren BW, Meeks JJ: Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RA-RPLND) in the adolescent population. J Pediatr Urol. 13(2):223-224, 2017
4- Mansfield SA, Murphy AJ, Talbot L, Prajapati H, Maller V, Pappo A, Singhal S, Krasin MJ, Davidoff AM, Abdelhafeez A: Alternative approaches to retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma. J Pediatr Surg. 55(12):2677-2681, 2020
5- Brown CT, Sebasti?o YV, Zann A, McLeod DJ, DaJusta D: Utilization of robotics for retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection in pediatric and non-pediatric hospitals. J Robot Surg. 14(6):865-870, 2020
6- Li W, Xiong L, Zhu Q, Lu H, Zhong M, Liang M, Jiang W, Wang Y, Cheng W: Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer. BMC Cancer. 21(1):484, 2021

   Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer

US for Necrotizing Enterocolitis

*Edited by: Humberto Lugo-Vicente, MD, FACS, FAAP
P.O. Box 10426, Caparra Heights Station, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00922-0426
Tel (787)-999-9450 (787)-340-1868 E-mail: pediatricsurpergypr@gmail.com
Internet Address:pedsurgeryupdate.com
® Copyright Office of the Library of Congress 1997


Home
Table
Index
Past
Review
Submit
Techniques
Editor
Handbook
Articles
Download
UPH
Journal Club
WWW
Meetings
Videos
Pediatric Surgery Update ISSN 1089-7739
Last updated: November 2024